The $20k test running now, then the rest in the order I lived it: how I trade, the prop-firm rules I trade under, and the bot. The same posts go out on Substack.
Running now: one indicator, one instrument, two months, $20,000. Dated readouts every Sunday.

Three days into the $2,400 test I found a better starting line. Here it is, with the numbers, before the first trade.

How I plan to climb the evaluations one week at a time: trade, log, let the journal get read, change one thing or nothing.

Real sessions from the five-year record, the three lines I draw before the open, and every signal marked taken or skipped with its result.

The four lines, the money, the tally at day zero, and the changelog. Updated every Sunday.
A prop payout, a break-even indicator, 60 days, one change a week. Scoreboard written first; dated readouts, good or bad.

A prop payout, a trading journal an AI can read, and a scoreboard I wrote down before I started.

A prop payout, a break-even indicator, 60 days, one change a week. Scoreboard written November 6. Updated every Sunday.

TradingView to a grader to my phone to TradeZella to a weekend test and back to the chart. No results yet; this is the machinery.

I trade futures for two hours before work and I'm trying to get a bot to do it for me. This is where I show the math, the process and the code, including the parts that don't work.
Practical advice for the 9-to-5 trader: two hours before work, written rules, small size.

One word for direction, two lines on the chart, a hard stop at 11:00, and a backtest that says it breaks even.

Two hours on weekdays, a few hours on the weekend, and smaller size than I used to think I needed.

Two mornings with the same two losing trades, and why only the tilted one hurts the account.

Price goes somewhere every day. A trade is only the part that matched my plan.

What a $10,000 day costs in size, and what it does to a payout.

On a long day I let the 15-minute chart show me buyers before I buy. It costs a few points and gives the stop a place to go.
One firm at a time: the rules, the math, and how I trade each account.

What an eval, a funded account and a locked funded account are each worth to me, and how I trade each one.

Tradeify's payout rule sets a minimum trade size, and a locked account traded below it is worth about $100.

How one end-of-day close freezes Tradeify's trailing floor, and what that does to a funded account's value.

Why I size up in a Tradeify eval, even though more risk makes each ticket worth less on paper.

Three setup filters run through the same simulator, and the one I use at each stage of a Tradeify account.

Lucid sells several accounts. Only one of the three main accounts gets you paid without building a cushion first.

Why a $75 evaluation buys more than a $200 instant account at the same $5,000 size.
Trying to take myself out of it: the YouTube study, the backtests, the bot that sends me signals.

Two YouTube channels, nine regular hosts who call their entries on air (plus the odd guest), 1,052 streams. I turned the talk into a table and lined it up with 1-minute prices.

A setup you can say in four steps is a rule, and a rule can be backtested. The first run looked great because the fills were wrong.

Topstep has the clean API, Lucid has the permission, and getting both onto one account takes a workaround.
New posts land on Substack first. Free, one a week. The $20k test has a scoreboard, updated every Sunday.
Subscribe on Substack